'The other superpower'
The “2006 Qana massacre” (the airstrike on July 30 by Israeli forces on a three-story building in the village of Qana that buried alive innocent civilians and children while they slept) has been brushed off by Dan Gillerman, the Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, in a disturbingly oblivious fashion: “When you sleep with a missile sometimes you don’t wake up in the morning.” Again, he was not blushing but stoic as he went on with his speech at the emergency session of the UN Security Council and made his case. “Those children may have been killed by Israeli fire, but they were the victims of Hezbollah.”
The day after, or on July 31, Mr. Gillerman appeared as guest at MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews, a political talk show. As expected, the ambassador during the interview was very eloquent in defense of his country’s cause before a cheering crowd serving as a backdrop of Mathew’s show held that night outside New York’s Rockefeller Center.
But there was something amiss with the sets: the crowd was waving American flags and Israeli flags. For what? The close-up turned out the other small placard being wagged by the happily hooting New Yorkers was in the shape of the MSNBC peacock logo - sans the distinctive peacock colors. With the blue and white hues of the logo merrily juxtaposed with the red, white and blue US flag, America looks like wholeheartedly endorsing Gillerman’s agitprop.
The images through which we are exposed to perceive people and events around us affect the way we behave or make judgment.
For example, at the turn of the last century, the yellow journalism of Randolph Heart’s Journal and Joseph Pulitzer’s World exploited the Cuban crisis and inflamed public opinion by blaming the explosion of the US battleship Maine to “Spanish mine.” The gung-ho sensationalism led to the outbreak of the Spanish-American War. The untold agenda among corporate elites however was expansionism, which they thought would translate to overseas market.
Post-WW I, the mood was different: keep America out of future wars. A series of books about the so-called merchants of death were published and congressional investigations conducted about the activities and lobbying of Big Business for American intervention in the world war to protect banking and corporate interests in loans and weapon sales to England and France. The publications and inquiries descended the public mind. Thus, the initial response in America to developments leading to the Axis of Germany, Italy and Japan in the run-up to WW II was revulsion to yet another war. FDR, owing to anti-war sentiment, at first only urged negotiation to handle growing Hitlerism or did little against the Japanese aggression in China. Also, bowing to anti-Semitism, a joint bill in 1939 to admit on humanitarian grounds German refugees, mostly Jewish children, was opposed overwhelmingly by the Americans.
Only recently, during the last presidential election, the infamous “Swift boat” campaign ad may have changed the political behavior of some voters that affected the outcome of the closely contested election. Although quite sophisticated, the Bush propaganda may still be blatantly dirty compared to the subtlety of the mendacious images of the MSNBC logo. The images were insidiously intended to rouse public approval of the continued bombardment of Lebanon if not furtively to produce some pro-Israeli bias in America.
The art of the “power of suggestion” is continually being perfected. Were Chris Matthew, the cagey hardball-playing political pundit, and his adulating props even aware they were being used?
Award-winning novelist Arundhati Roy provides us some insight:
What’s coming to light however is that the countervailing force to managed public opinion is the collective strength of people-powered opinion. Public outcry, not the combined force of state powers, has compelled the suspension of the Israeli bombardment of Lebanon for at least 48 hours. The lessons of the Vietnam War tell us that could be improved on.
The day after, or on July 31, Mr. Gillerman appeared as guest at MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews, a political talk show. As expected, the ambassador during the interview was very eloquent in defense of his country’s cause before a cheering crowd serving as a backdrop of Mathew’s show held that night outside New York’s Rockefeller Center.
But there was something amiss with the sets: the crowd was waving American flags and Israeli flags. For what? The close-up turned out the other small placard being wagged by the happily hooting New Yorkers was in the shape of the MSNBC peacock logo - sans the distinctive peacock colors. With the blue and white hues of the logo merrily juxtaposed with the red, white and blue US flag, America looks like wholeheartedly endorsing Gillerman’s agitprop.
The images through which we are exposed to perceive people and events around us affect the way we behave or make judgment.
For example, at the turn of the last century, the yellow journalism of Randolph Heart’s Journal and Joseph Pulitzer’s World exploited the Cuban crisis and inflamed public opinion by blaming the explosion of the US battleship Maine to “Spanish mine.” The gung-ho sensationalism led to the outbreak of the Spanish-American War. The untold agenda among corporate elites however was expansionism, which they thought would translate to overseas market.
Post-WW I, the mood was different: keep America out of future wars. A series of books about the so-called merchants of death were published and congressional investigations conducted about the activities and lobbying of Big Business for American intervention in the world war to protect banking and corporate interests in loans and weapon sales to England and France. The publications and inquiries descended the public mind. Thus, the initial response in America to developments leading to the Axis of Germany, Italy and Japan in the run-up to WW II was revulsion to yet another war. FDR, owing to anti-war sentiment, at first only urged negotiation to handle growing Hitlerism or did little against the Japanese aggression in China. Also, bowing to anti-Semitism, a joint bill in 1939 to admit on humanitarian grounds German refugees, mostly Jewish children, was opposed overwhelmingly by the Americans.
Only recently, during the last presidential election, the infamous “Swift boat” campaign ad may have changed the political behavior of some voters that affected the outcome of the closely contested election. Although quite sophisticated, the Bush propaganda may still be blatantly dirty compared to the subtlety of the mendacious images of the MSNBC logo. The images were insidiously intended to rouse public approval of the continued bombardment of Lebanon if not furtively to produce some pro-Israeli bias in America.
The art of the “power of suggestion” is continually being perfected. Were Chris Matthew, the cagey hardball-playing political pundit, and his adulating props even aware they were being used?
Award-winning novelist Arundhati Roy provides us some insight:
[I]t is almost axiomatic for thousands, possibly millions, of us that public opinion in “free market” democracies is manufactured just like any other mass market product - soap, switches, or sliced bread. We know that while, legally and constitutionally, speech may be free, the space in which that freedom can be exercised has been snatched from us and auctioned to the highest bidders.Who are the highest bidders? Who controls the media? The public mind? Your guess is as good as mine. Google it.
What’s coming to light however is that the countervailing force to managed public opinion is the collective strength of people-powered opinion. Public outcry, not the combined force of state powers, has compelled the suspension of the Israeli bombardment of Lebanon for at least 48 hours. The lessons of the Vietnam War tell us that could be improved on.
5 Comments:
Abe, thanks for the further clarification. Paul Krugman made a related observation to explain the divergence between America's and the rest of the world's opinion. He cites the average American's exposure to Fox, CNN and the major networks (CBS, ABC, NBC) compared to the rest of the world's exposure to more varied sources such as BBC, Al-Jazeera and the like. In one of his columns ('The China Syndrome' May 13,2003 found in http://www.pkarchive.org/), he described the insidious role that media conglomerates like Rupert Murdoch's Fox News play in this process. He concludes that in this respect, consolidation of media ownership is a danger in that the media giant will tend to 'present the news in a way that pleases the party in power'.
MB, i take it that you've read George Lakoff's book "Don't Think of an Elephant"?
mb, i see. it's all about the frames and narratives that the Republicans have been using successfully. its message is consistent with the points you have raised on this subject.
Abe, cvj,
I've noticed that these last 7 days or so, BBC newscasts and commentaries on Lebanon have shifted a degree with a tiny wee bit more emphasis on damages in Israel than on Lebanon.
Their internet site on the crisis also contains more stories on human horrors in Israel.
I don't know if BBC's management is under a political pressure of some kind or if the news director has taken it upon himself to do things that way to give belleaguered Tony Blair some breathing space.
Maybe, I'll e-mail the BBC about my observation.
Enjoyed a lot!
Commercial floor mats logo florida treatment eczema 1996 land rover parts advance waterbeds svc sarasota fl National benefit life insurance company new york tv Floor mats for mercedes auto Retailer branded visa mastercards Glbl baseball Pales tvs juvenile spanking in movies tv guardian dental guard insurance Baccarat crystal in uk kreisen and tv and reviews Electronics and tvs
prada outlet
dolce & gabbana sunglasses
coach handbags
adidas superstars
adidas outlet online
coach factory outlet
cincinnati bengals jersey
coach handbags outlet
christian louboutin
cazal outlet
yolo
Post a Comment
<< Home